WEBVTT
1
00:00:01.600 --> 00:00:07.160
You remember it clear as day, The Berenstein Bears, a
2
00:00:07.240 --> 00:00:12.839
genie movie starring sinbab a monocled monopoly man, but none
3
00:00:12.839 --> 00:00:19.440
of it ever existed. Tonight we unravel the phenomenon known
4
00:00:19.839 --> 00:00:24.280
as the Mandela effect, where mass false memories leave entire
5
00:00:24.359 --> 00:00:27.120
generations questioning reality.
6
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:32.479
What you were about to betake is burd to be
7
00:00:34.479 --> 00:00:42.200
based on witness accounts, testaments, and public record. This is
8
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:46.759
terrifying and truth truth.
9
00:00:53.719 --> 00:00:59.320
All across the globe people report the same unsettling experience,
10
00:01:00.119 --> 00:01:06.840
memories of things that never happened. A children's book spelled wrong,
11
00:01:07.640 --> 00:01:12.400
a movie that never existed, a quote remembered by millions
12
00:01:13.239 --> 00:01:17.959
that was never spoken. They call it the Mandela effect,
13
00:01:18.599 --> 00:01:24.480
shared false memories that defy explanation. Is it a simple
14
00:01:24.599 --> 00:01:32.000
failure of memory or are we experiencing something far more mysterious,
15
00:01:32.959 --> 00:01:37.400
perhaps a glimpse into an altered reality. Tonight we examine
16
00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:43.680
the eerie science, the speculation, and the chilling possibilities. Right
17
00:01:43.719 --> 00:02:01.000
after this, imagine having a clear memory of something that
18
00:02:01.159 --> 00:02:08.120
never actually happened. Perhaps you vividly recall a childhood's storybook
19
00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:14.879
being called The Berenstein Bears, only to discover every copy
20
00:02:15.240 --> 00:02:22.599
is titled bren Stain bears an unfamiliar spelling, or you'd
21
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:28.840
swear you once watched a movie named Chazam starring comedian
22
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:37.159
Simbad as a genie, yet no such film exists. These
23
00:02:37.479 --> 00:02:43.759
unsettling moments, which feel like glitches in reality, have an
24
00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:51.599
equally eerie name, the Mandela Effect. This term describes the
25
00:02:51.639 --> 00:02:58.319
strange phenomenon of mass false memories, instances where large groups
26
00:02:58.360 --> 00:03:04.120
of people share the same exact, misremembered detail or event
27
00:03:04.960 --> 00:03:12.360
with absolute conviction that it's true. The effect's namesake comes
28
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:18.960
from countless people insisting they remember Nelson Mandela dying in
29
00:03:19.039 --> 00:03:24.439
prison in the nineteen eighties, even recalling news clips and
30
00:03:24.639 --> 00:03:30.840
a widow's speech, when in fact, Mandela lived until two
31
00:03:30.879 --> 00:03:36.800
thousand and thirteen. The Mandela affects story begins with a
32
00:03:36.919 --> 00:03:41.840
chill of deja vu. At a sci fi and paranormal
33
00:03:41.960 --> 00:03:47.439
conference in two thousand and nine, writer and self described
34
00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:53.879
paranormal researcher Fiona Broome was chatting with fellow attendees when
35
00:03:53.919 --> 00:03:59.919
she realized they all shared an oddly specific memory former
36
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:05.800
South African President Nelson Mandela dying in prison during the
37
00:04:05.879 --> 00:04:12.639
nineteen eighties. Broome herself vividly remembered Mandela's funeral on TV
38
00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:19.000
and even recalled a heartfelt speech by his widow, events
39
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:25.120
that never actually occurred in reality. Mandela was released from
40
00:04:25.160 --> 00:04:30.600
prison in nineteen ninety and passed away much later in
41
00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:37.040
two thy thirteen. Stunned that so many unrelated people could
42
00:04:37.079 --> 00:04:43.120
remember the same nonexistent event in such detail, Broom since
43
00:04:43.360 --> 00:04:48.959
she had stumbled onto something bizarre, she then coined the
44
00:04:49.000 --> 00:04:55.839
aforementioned term Mandela Effect and launched a website inviting others
45
00:04:55.920 --> 00:05:03.560
to share similar experiences. The response was explosive. Hundreds of
46
00:05:03.639 --> 00:05:08.759
people began posting about other shared false memories that left
47
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:15.319
them questioning their own reality. As story after story poured in,
48
00:05:15.879 --> 00:05:22.399
from misremembered movie lines to geography that felt off, the
49
00:05:22.439 --> 00:05:28.800
Mandela Effect went viral. It quickly spread beyond Broome's sight
50
00:05:29.519 --> 00:05:35.600
and entered popular culture discourse, even inspiring a twenty nineteen
51
00:05:35.759 --> 00:05:43.160
science fiction film titled The Mandela Effect. Importantly, Broome initially
52
00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:48.279
avoided pinning down a cause for these eerie collective slip ups,
53
00:05:49.160 --> 00:05:55.480
but as discussions grew, she openly mused about paranormal possibilities.
54
00:05:56.560 --> 00:06:04.120
Being a paranormal enthusiast, Broom favored fun speculative explanations, hinting
55
00:06:04.199 --> 00:06:10.000
that perhaps parallel realities or shifts in the timeline were
56
00:06:10.079 --> 00:06:16.279
responsible for the discrepancies. In her view, these were like
57
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:24.199
science fiction scenarios come to life. However, mainstream scientists had
58
00:06:24.720 --> 00:06:30.560
a different idea. Maybe the culprit wasn't a cosmic glitch
59
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:37.680
after all, but rather the fallible and fascinating machinery of
60
00:06:37.879 --> 00:06:43.319
human memory. A still from Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back.
61
00:06:44.279 --> 00:06:49.519
Many fans misquote this scene by remembering Darth Vader saying Luke,
62
00:06:50.240 --> 00:06:54.560
I am your father, a line that is never actually
63
00:06:54.720 --> 00:07:00.800
spoken in the film. The Mandela effect manifests in countless
64
00:07:00.839 --> 00:07:08.199
examples that often leave people feeling spooked and disoriented. Here
65
00:07:08.240 --> 00:07:12.759
are some of the most famous instances where reality doesn't
66
00:07:12.839 --> 00:07:20.759
quite match the collective memory. The Berenstein Bears. Many who
67
00:07:20.839 --> 00:07:24.480
grew up reading the beloved children's book about a family
68
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:29.480
of bears are adamant. The series was called The Berenstein
69
00:07:29.759 --> 00:07:35.240
Bears spelled with an ei N, In reality, it has
70
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:39.680
always been the bren Stain Bears with an ai N,
71
00:07:40.759 --> 00:07:47.839
named after its authors Stan and Jan Berenstein. Discovering this
72
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:52.759
one letter difference, has sent countless readers into a frenzy,
73
00:07:53.600 --> 00:07:59.120
convinced Berenstein is what they saw on those covers as kids,
74
00:08:00.439 --> 00:08:06.319
Shazam the movie that never was. A large community of
75
00:08:06.439 --> 00:08:11.920
people swear they remember a lighthearted nineteen nineties family film
76
00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:18.079
called Shazam starring comedian Sindbad as a wish granting genie.
77
00:08:19.199 --> 00:08:25.360
Some even recount distinct scenes or VHS box art, but
78
00:08:26.199 --> 00:08:32.960
there was no such movie ever. The closest real film
79
00:08:33.159 --> 00:08:38.759
is Kazam from nineteen ninety six, which featured Shaquille O'Neill
80
00:08:39.279 --> 00:08:44.679
as a genie. How did so many people independently generate
81
00:08:45.080 --> 00:08:52.200
the same vivid but false memory of Shazam. We'll explore
82
00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:56.399
theories soon, but this example remains one of the most
83
00:08:56.600 --> 00:09:01.919
mind boggling Mandela effects on record. In the realm of
84
00:09:02.120 --> 00:09:07.240
film media, it's not only the imagined existence of films,
85
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:12.279
but also quotes from some of our most iconic movies.
86
00:09:19.679 --> 00:09:26.679
Iconic lines from films often lodge in our memories, sometimes incorrectly.
87
00:09:27.399 --> 00:09:31.440
A classic example comes from Star Wars, which we mentioned earlier.
88
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:36.559
In the climactic scene Darth Vader reveals his identity to
89
00:09:36.679 --> 00:09:42.960
Luke Skywalker. Most fans hear Vader's voice saying Luke, I
90
00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:50.639
am your father. In reality, the line was no, I
91
00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:54.960
am your father. Listen to the film and you'll find
92
00:09:55.159 --> 00:10:00.240
Luke is never said. Yet the mistaken line has been
93
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:05.840
repeated in impressions, t shirts, and pop culture for decades,
94
00:10:06.559 --> 00:10:13.039
cementing itself as the truth in many minds. Similarly, snow
95
00:10:13.039 --> 00:10:19.080
White's Evil Queen never actually says mirror mirror on the wall.
96
00:10:19.919 --> 00:10:24.200
In the original nineteen thirty seven Disney film, she addresses
97
00:10:24.279 --> 00:10:29.200
her magic mirror with the line magic mirror on the wall.
98
00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:34.360
Who is the fairest one of all? Somehow, the alliterative
99
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:40.600
mirror mirror version took hold in public memory, perhaps assisted
100
00:10:40.679 --> 00:10:45.960
by adaptations and parodies, and to this day people feel
101
00:10:46.000 --> 00:10:49.840
a jolt of disbelief when they learn the mirror was
102
00:10:50.440 --> 00:10:56.639
magic all along. These kinds of Mandela effect examples abound.
103
00:10:57.759 --> 00:11:02.519
Hellocharis was never ever spoken in the Silence of the Lambs.
104
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:08.039
Clarice's greeting is different, and the line if you build it,
105
00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:13.279
they will come from field of Dreams is actually he
106
00:11:13.799 --> 00:11:19.399
will come, referring to one character and not a crowd.
107
00:11:20.240 --> 00:11:24.240
In each case, the incorrect quote is remembered far more
108
00:11:24.320 --> 00:11:29.200
widely than the real one, a creepy reminder that even
109
00:11:29.320 --> 00:11:35.519
our most confident memories can be false. Those are just
110
00:11:35.600 --> 00:11:39.759
a few of the better known Mandela effects, but there
111
00:11:39.799 --> 00:11:46.919
are many many more. People have reported everything from geographic
112
00:11:47.039 --> 00:11:52.679
misplacements some swear New Zealand used to be north of Australia,
113
00:11:53.320 --> 00:11:59.000
not southeast, to altered names of products Jeff peanut butter
114
00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:04.320
being remembered as as Jiffy, which never existed as a brand,
115
00:12:04.720 --> 00:12:10.720
two entire historical details that don't match the records. What's
116
00:12:10.879 --> 00:12:15.360
consistent is that these memories tend to be shared by
117
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:20.679
a large number of unrelated people. It's one thing for
118
00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:26.120
you to misremember something, but when thousands of others confidently
119
00:12:26.200 --> 00:12:31.799
remember it the same wrong way, it feels like reality
120
00:12:31.840 --> 00:12:37.440
itself might be bending. Before we get carried away with
121
00:12:37.879 --> 00:12:43.799
paranormal explanations, let's dig into what science knows about memory
122
00:12:44.600 --> 00:12:49.440
and how so many people could misremember the same thing.
123
00:12:51.039 --> 00:12:56.960
From a cognitive psychology standpoint, there's nothing supernatural about the
124
00:12:57.000 --> 00:13:03.240
Mandela effect. Human memory is fallible and prone to quirks
125
00:13:03.320 --> 00:13:08.360
that can affect many people in the same way. Far
126
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:13.480
from a perfect recording device, our brains reconstruct memories out
127
00:13:13.519 --> 00:13:17.799
of bits and pieces, and in the process they can
128
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:24.840
and do make errors. In fact, each time you recall something,
129
00:13:25.200 --> 00:13:29.840
your brain may subtly alter it before storing it again.
130
00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:36.720
Over time, these alterations can accumulate so that your recollection
131
00:13:37.480 --> 00:13:45.200
drifts further from reality. Memory researchers have long documented phenomena
132
00:13:45.840 --> 00:13:52.440
like false memories and misinformation effects. The Mandela effect appears
133
00:13:52.519 --> 00:13:58.399
to be a spectacular instance of collective false memory, likely
134
00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:03.720
arising from nor normal brain tendencies that we all share.
135
00:14:05.399 --> 00:14:11.759
Psychologists highlight several key mechanisms that help explain these shared
136
00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:19.840
memory distortions. Schema and association. Our mind use schemas patterns
137
00:14:19.879 --> 00:14:24.759
of related knowledge to fill in gaps in memory. We
138
00:14:24.919 --> 00:14:28.159
tend to remember these the way we expect them to be.
139
00:14:29.120 --> 00:14:33.799
For example, people might assume the monopoly man wears a
140
00:14:33.879 --> 00:14:38.120
monocle because a monocle fits the image of a paush
141
00:14:38.639 --> 00:14:44.600
early twentieth century tycoon. In a twenty twenty two study
142
00:14:44.639 --> 00:14:50.360
on the visual Mandela effect, researchers indeed found that many
143
00:14:50.600 --> 00:14:56.240
visual misrememberings, like the monocle that never was, stem from
144
00:14:56.279 --> 00:15:02.840
our brain's schema driven expectations. In other words, we remember
145
00:15:02.879 --> 00:15:07.399
a detail that makes sense even if it wasn't truly
146
00:15:07.600 --> 00:15:13.759
there because it aligns with our mental image. This study,
147
00:15:13.960 --> 00:15:19.519
conducted at the University of Chicago, confirmed that consistent false
148
00:15:19.600 --> 00:15:29.000
memories of certain images are a real, measurable phenomenon across people. Interestingly,
149
00:15:29.399 --> 00:15:34.679
the scholars concluded that no single explanation fits all cases.
150
00:15:35.759 --> 00:15:42.279
Some false memories arise from schema or expectations, others from
151
00:15:42.360 --> 00:15:48.080
one version of an image being more intrinsically memorable than another,
152
00:15:49.320 --> 00:15:56.200
meaning each Mandela effect may have its own mix of causes. Still,
153
00:15:56.840 --> 00:16:01.120
the take home message is that our memory tends to
154
00:16:01.399 --> 00:16:07.320
edit reality to fit our preconceived notions, and if many
155
00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:13.159
people share that same notion, they'll likely misremember in the
156
00:16:13.200 --> 00:16:19.440
same way. Confabulation is a technical term for the brain's
157
00:16:19.600 --> 00:16:25.200
habit of fabricating details in order to fill memory gaps
158
00:16:25.720 --> 00:16:34.080
without the person realizing it. Confabulation isn't lying. It happens subconsciously.
159
00:16:34.960 --> 00:16:39.799
Your brain wants memories to form a coherent story, so
160
00:16:40.240 --> 00:16:46.639
when bits are missing, it may unintentionally invent plausible details
161
00:16:47.120 --> 00:16:52.120
in order to plug the holes. Over time, these invented
162
00:16:52.240 --> 00:16:58.879
details feel just as real as the true information. For instance,
163
00:16:59.480 --> 00:17:05.160
someone recalling the Berenstain Bears might think it was spelled
164
00:17:05.319 --> 00:17:12.599
like Steen, wasn't it because many common surnames Einstein, Frankenstein,
165
00:17:13.359 --> 00:17:19.160
and in stei n and their brain plugs in that
166
00:17:19.960 --> 00:17:25.920
familiar pattern. If lots of people's brains do this, they
167
00:17:26.039 --> 00:17:42.559
all confidently misremember the spelling together. It's worth noting confabulation
168
00:17:42.960 --> 00:17:47.440
tends to increase with age, which might be why many
169
00:17:47.599 --> 00:17:55.279
Mandela affect examples involve childhood popular culture. People recalling things
170
00:17:55.359 --> 00:17:59.559
from decades ago might be more likely to have filled
171
00:17:59.559 --> 00:18:06.920
in gasps over time. Then there's the misinformation effect. Our
172
00:18:07.119 --> 00:18:13.759
memories are vulnerable to post event information. Simply hearing or
173
00:18:14.039 --> 00:18:18.880
reading a wrong detail can implant a false memory of it.
174
00:18:19.680 --> 00:18:25.599
Psychologists have shown that if someone subtly suggests an incorrect fact,
175
00:18:26.440 --> 00:18:30.440
even with a single word choice, it can alter how
176
00:18:30.519 --> 00:18:35.759
others recall that event. In the context of the Mandela effect,
177
00:18:36.319 --> 00:18:41.720
Once a false idea starts circulating, such as it was mirror,
178
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:46.039
mirror on the wall in snow white, it can spread
179
00:18:46.160 --> 00:18:52.680
like wildfire and contaminate many people's recollections. A person might
180
00:18:52.759 --> 00:18:56.960
not even remember where they heard the incorrect version first,
181
00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:03.680
they just internalize it as what they remember. I witness
182
00:19:03.880 --> 00:19:09.200
testimony studies demonstrate how easily memories can be swayed by
183
00:19:09.440 --> 00:19:16.000
external suggestions. In mass media and online discussions, a single
184
00:19:16.240 --> 00:19:22.839
confidently stated false memory can ripple out to affect thousands
185
00:19:22.920 --> 00:19:30.839
of other people's memories. Then there's priming and suggestion related
186
00:19:30.920 --> 00:19:35.400
to misinformation. Priming is when our brains are prepared to
187
00:19:35.519 --> 00:19:40.319
perceive or remember something in a certain way due to
188
00:19:40.680 --> 00:19:45.079
prior cues. If you ask one group of people did
189
00:19:45.160 --> 00:19:49.480
you see the black car speed past? And another group
190
00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:54.319
did you see the black car? The first phrasing suggests
191
00:19:54.400 --> 00:19:59.720
there definitely was a speeding black car, and those people
192
00:19:59.799 --> 00:20:04.160
may later insist they saw it even if it wasn't there.
193
00:20:05.480 --> 00:20:10.119
With the Mandela effect, collective memories can be shaped by
194
00:20:10.160 --> 00:20:16.720
how questions or ideas are posed. For example, a forum
195
00:20:16.839 --> 00:20:21.599
post that says who else remembers the Oscar Meyer Beloney logo?
196
00:20:21.799 --> 00:20:26.759
Having an E instead of an A in myer primes
197
00:20:26.880 --> 00:20:32.400
readers to search their memory for that spelling, and many
198
00:20:32.559 --> 00:20:40.119
then feel like they do indeed recall it, reinforcing the idea.
199
00:20:40.160 --> 00:20:46.720
Our brains are highly suggestible, especially when a question presupposes
200
00:20:47.279 --> 00:20:54.200
a detail. Then there are shared cultural influences. Many mandela
201
00:20:54.319 --> 00:20:59.119
affect false memories can be traced to common sources or
202
00:20:59.400 --> 00:21:04.440
influences that set us all on the same wrong track.
203
00:21:05.480 --> 00:21:10.440
A parody or reference in popular culture can override the
204
00:21:10.519 --> 00:21:16.759
original memory. For instance, Sally Field's Oscar acceptance speech is
205
00:21:16.839 --> 00:21:21.319
often misquoted as you like me, you really like me,
206
00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:28.000
even by those who never saw it live. Why likely
207
00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:34.240
because actor Jim Carrey parodied that incorrect line in the Mask,
208
00:21:35.160 --> 00:21:41.079
and his version stuck in people's heads. Likewise, the line
209
00:21:41.559 --> 00:21:45.079
mirror mirror on the Wall was the title of a
210
00:21:45.160 --> 00:21:50.440
popular Snow White adaptation and is just catchier to say,
211
00:21:51.559 --> 00:21:56.839
so that's what got absorbed into collective memory. These kinds
212
00:21:56.880 --> 00:22:01.680
of media echoes mean large numbers of people are exposed
213
00:22:01.720 --> 00:22:07.279
to the same misleading version of an event or quote,
214
00:22:07.359 --> 00:22:14.119
resulting in the same misremembering. Even logos and images can
215
00:22:14.200 --> 00:22:20.319
be culturally primed. We've all seen generic depictions of overflowing
216
00:22:20.400 --> 00:22:25.359
fruit baskets, hence the false memory of a cornicopia in
217
00:22:25.440 --> 00:22:30.599
the Fruit of the Loom's logo, or cartoon aristocrats with monocles,
218
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:34.720
leading us to add a monocle to mister monopoly. As
219
00:22:34.759 --> 00:22:39.880
we pointed out in essence, our brains are pattern seeking
220
00:22:40.000 --> 00:22:46.000
machines that often substitute logical guesses for missing facts, and
221
00:22:46.119 --> 00:22:51.519
our memories are socially influenced by what others say, so
222
00:22:51.839 --> 00:22:54.880
it's not a huge leap to realize that, if the
223
00:22:54.960 --> 00:22:59.839
conditions are right, lots of people will form the same
224
00:23:00.119 --> 00:23:06.240
false memory. As one research paper aptly noted, examples of
225
00:23:06.319 --> 00:23:11.640
Mandela effect are likely quote explained in terms of the
226
00:23:11.720 --> 00:23:19.559
fallibility of human memory, rather than alternate realities. One study
227
00:23:19.759 --> 00:23:24.680
even found that seventy six percent of people made some
228
00:23:24.839 --> 00:23:30.759
kind of mistake when asked to recall details. Memory errors
229
00:23:30.880 --> 00:23:36.960
are the rule, not the exception. Most of the time
230
00:23:37.119 --> 00:23:42.079
we don't notice these errors. The Mandela effect only comes
231
00:23:42.119 --> 00:23:46.160
to light when a critical mass of people compare notes
232
00:23:46.839 --> 00:23:53.279
and realize they all remember something else in unison. And
233
00:23:53.359 --> 00:23:57.960
in the age of the Internet, that's exactly what's happening.
234
00:23:59.000 --> 00:24:04.240
If faulty human memory is the tender, the Internet is
235
00:24:04.319 --> 00:24:08.839
the spark that has set the Mandela effect ablaze in
236
00:24:08.960 --> 00:24:14.880
modern culture. In earlier decades, you might have privately misremembered
237
00:24:14.920 --> 00:24:19.000
a detail or two. Perhaps you'd even joke with a
238
00:24:19.079 --> 00:24:22.839
friend about a line from a movie and discover one
239
00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:28.119
of you was wrong. But today we have instant, global
240
00:24:28.160 --> 00:24:33.480
connectivity to find countless others with the same memory quirks,
241
00:24:34.200 --> 00:24:42.519
and this connectivity greatly amplifies the Mandela effect. Online communities
242
00:24:42.559 --> 00:24:47.480
allow people to share their eerie memory discrepancies and validate
243
00:24:47.519 --> 00:24:51.079
each other. A false memory that might have died out