July 21, 2025

Terrifying & True | Mandela Effect Explained – False Memories, Mass Confusion, and the Mystery of Alternate Realities

Terrifying & True | Mandela Effect Explained – False Memories, Mass Confusion, and the Mystery of Alternate Realities

You clearly remember “Berenstein Bears,” a movie called Shazaam, and Darth Vader saying, “Luke, I am your father.” But none of those are real—at least, not in this universe. In this mind-bending episode, we explore the Mandela Effect: the bizarre phenomenon of mass false memories. From psychological misfires to multiverse theories, we investigate whether these shared illusions are proof of human error… or evidence of something stranger.

We're telling that story tonight

🎧 Listen now and subscribe for more horror!

🎉 Unlock bonus content and support us on Patreon !📬

Contact Us / Submit Your Story

🎵 Music by Ray Mattis
Check out Ray’s work here!

👨‍💼 Executive Producers: Rob Fields, Mark Shields, Bobbletopia.com

🎥 Produced by: Daniel Wilder

For everything else check out WeeklySpooky.com


🎧 LISTEN NOW and subscribe for spine-tingling horror stories every week!

🎉 Unlock exclusive bonus episodes and support the show on Patreon!
👉 WeeklySpooky.com/Join

📬 Contact Us / Submit Your Horror Story!

🎵 Music by Ray Mattis 👉 Check out Ray’s incredible work here !
👨‍💼 Executive Producers: Rob Fields, Bobbletopia.com
🎥 Produced by: Daniel Wilder
🌐 Explore more terrifying tales at: WeeklySpooky.com
WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.600 --> 00:00:07.160
You remember it clear as day, The Berenstein Bears, a

2
00:00:07.240 --> 00:00:12.839
genie movie starring sinbab a monocled monopoly man, but none

3
00:00:12.839 --> 00:00:19.440
of it ever existed. Tonight we unravel the phenomenon known

4
00:00:19.839 --> 00:00:24.280
as the Mandela effect, where mass false memories leave entire

5
00:00:24.359 --> 00:00:27.120
generations questioning reality.

6
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:32.479
What you were about to betake is burd to be

7
00:00:34.479 --> 00:00:42.200
based on witness accounts, testaments, and public record. This is

8
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:46.759
terrifying and truth truth.

9
00:00:53.719 --> 00:00:59.320
All across the globe people report the same unsettling experience,

10
00:01:00.119 --> 00:01:06.840
memories of things that never happened. A children's book spelled wrong,

11
00:01:07.640 --> 00:01:12.400
a movie that never existed, a quote remembered by millions

12
00:01:13.239 --> 00:01:17.959
that was never spoken. They call it the Mandela effect,

13
00:01:18.599 --> 00:01:24.480
shared false memories that defy explanation. Is it a simple

14
00:01:24.599 --> 00:01:32.000
failure of memory or are we experiencing something far more mysterious,

15
00:01:32.959 --> 00:01:37.400
perhaps a glimpse into an altered reality. Tonight we examine

16
00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:43.680
the eerie science, the speculation, and the chilling possibilities. Right

17
00:01:43.719 --> 00:02:01.000
after this, imagine having a clear memory of something that

18
00:02:01.159 --> 00:02:08.120
never actually happened. Perhaps you vividly recall a childhood's storybook

19
00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:14.879
being called The Berenstein Bears, only to discover every copy

20
00:02:15.240 --> 00:02:22.599
is titled bren Stain bears an unfamiliar spelling, or you'd

21
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:28.840
swear you once watched a movie named Chazam starring comedian

22
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:37.159
Simbad as a genie, yet no such film exists. These

23
00:02:37.479 --> 00:02:43.759
unsettling moments, which feel like glitches in reality, have an

24
00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:51.599
equally eerie name, the Mandela Effect. This term describes the

25
00:02:51.639 --> 00:02:58.319
strange phenomenon of mass false memories, instances where large groups

26
00:02:58.360 --> 00:03:04.120
of people share the same exact, misremembered detail or event

27
00:03:04.960 --> 00:03:12.360
with absolute conviction that it's true. The effect's namesake comes

28
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:18.960
from countless people insisting they remember Nelson Mandela dying in

29
00:03:19.039 --> 00:03:24.439
prison in the nineteen eighties, even recalling news clips and

30
00:03:24.639 --> 00:03:30.840
a widow's speech, when in fact, Mandela lived until two

31
00:03:30.879 --> 00:03:36.800
thousand and thirteen. The Mandela affects story begins with a

32
00:03:36.919 --> 00:03:41.840
chill of deja vu. At a sci fi and paranormal

33
00:03:41.960 --> 00:03:47.439
conference in two thousand and nine, writer and self described

34
00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:53.879
paranormal researcher Fiona Broome was chatting with fellow attendees when

35
00:03:53.919 --> 00:03:59.919
she realized they all shared an oddly specific memory former

36
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:05.800
South African President Nelson Mandela dying in prison during the

37
00:04:05.879 --> 00:04:12.639
nineteen eighties. Broome herself vividly remembered Mandela's funeral on TV

38
00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:19.000
and even recalled a heartfelt speech by his widow, events

39
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:25.120
that never actually occurred in reality. Mandela was released from

40
00:04:25.160 --> 00:04:30.600
prison in nineteen ninety and passed away much later in

41
00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:37.040
two thy thirteen. Stunned that so many unrelated people could

42
00:04:37.079 --> 00:04:43.120
remember the same nonexistent event in such detail, Broom since

43
00:04:43.360 --> 00:04:48.959
she had stumbled onto something bizarre, she then coined the

44
00:04:49.000 --> 00:04:55.839
aforementioned term Mandela Effect and launched a website inviting others

45
00:04:55.920 --> 00:05:03.560
to share similar experiences. The response was explosive. Hundreds of

46
00:05:03.639 --> 00:05:08.759
people began posting about other shared false memories that left

47
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:15.319
them questioning their own reality. As story after story poured in,

48
00:05:15.879 --> 00:05:22.399
from misremembered movie lines to geography that felt off, the

49
00:05:22.439 --> 00:05:28.800
Mandela Effect went viral. It quickly spread beyond Broome's sight

50
00:05:29.519 --> 00:05:35.600
and entered popular culture discourse, even inspiring a twenty nineteen

51
00:05:35.759 --> 00:05:43.160
science fiction film titled The Mandela Effect. Importantly, Broome initially

52
00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:48.279
avoided pinning down a cause for these eerie collective slip ups,

53
00:05:49.160 --> 00:05:55.480
but as discussions grew, she openly mused about paranormal possibilities.

54
00:05:56.560 --> 00:06:04.120
Being a paranormal enthusiast, Broom favored fun speculative explanations, hinting

55
00:06:04.199 --> 00:06:10.000
that perhaps parallel realities or shifts in the timeline were

56
00:06:10.079 --> 00:06:16.279
responsible for the discrepancies. In her view, these were like

57
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:24.199
science fiction scenarios come to life. However, mainstream scientists had

58
00:06:24.720 --> 00:06:30.560
a different idea. Maybe the culprit wasn't a cosmic glitch

59
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:37.680
after all, but rather the fallible and fascinating machinery of

60
00:06:37.879 --> 00:06:43.319
human memory. A still from Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back.

61
00:06:44.279 --> 00:06:49.519
Many fans misquote this scene by remembering Darth Vader saying Luke,

62
00:06:50.240 --> 00:06:54.560
I am your father, a line that is never actually

63
00:06:54.720 --> 00:07:00.800
spoken in the film. The Mandela effect manifests in countless

64
00:07:00.839 --> 00:07:08.199
examples that often leave people feeling spooked and disoriented. Here

65
00:07:08.240 --> 00:07:12.759
are some of the most famous instances where reality doesn't

66
00:07:12.839 --> 00:07:20.759
quite match the collective memory. The Berenstein Bears. Many who

67
00:07:20.839 --> 00:07:24.480
grew up reading the beloved children's book about a family

68
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:29.480
of bears are adamant. The series was called The Berenstein

69
00:07:29.759 --> 00:07:35.240
Bears spelled with an ei N, In reality, it has

70
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:39.680
always been the bren Stain Bears with an ai N,

71
00:07:40.759 --> 00:07:47.839
named after its authors Stan and Jan Berenstein. Discovering this

72
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:52.759
one letter difference, has sent countless readers into a frenzy,

73
00:07:53.600 --> 00:07:59.120
convinced Berenstein is what they saw on those covers as kids,

74
00:08:00.439 --> 00:08:06.319
Shazam the movie that never was. A large community of

75
00:08:06.439 --> 00:08:11.920
people swear they remember a lighthearted nineteen nineties family film

76
00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:18.079
called Shazam starring comedian Sindbad as a wish granting genie.

77
00:08:19.199 --> 00:08:25.360
Some even recount distinct scenes or VHS box art, but

78
00:08:26.199 --> 00:08:32.960
there was no such movie ever. The closest real film

79
00:08:33.159 --> 00:08:38.759
is Kazam from nineteen ninety six, which featured Shaquille O'Neill

80
00:08:39.279 --> 00:08:44.679
as a genie. How did so many people independently generate

81
00:08:45.080 --> 00:08:52.200
the same vivid but false memory of Shazam. We'll explore

82
00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:56.399
theories soon, but this example remains one of the most

83
00:08:56.600 --> 00:09:01.919
mind boggling Mandela effects on record. In the realm of

84
00:09:02.120 --> 00:09:07.240
film media, it's not only the imagined existence of films,

85
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:12.279
but also quotes from some of our most iconic movies.

86
00:09:19.679 --> 00:09:26.679
Iconic lines from films often lodge in our memories, sometimes incorrectly.

87
00:09:27.399 --> 00:09:31.440
A classic example comes from Star Wars, which we mentioned earlier.

88
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:36.559
In the climactic scene Darth Vader reveals his identity to

89
00:09:36.679 --> 00:09:42.960
Luke Skywalker. Most fans hear Vader's voice saying Luke, I

90
00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:50.639
am your father. In reality, the line was no, I

91
00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:54.960
am your father. Listen to the film and you'll find

92
00:09:55.159 --> 00:10:00.240
Luke is never said. Yet the mistaken line has been

93
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:05.840
repeated in impressions, t shirts, and pop culture for decades,

94
00:10:06.559 --> 00:10:13.039
cementing itself as the truth in many minds. Similarly, snow

95
00:10:13.039 --> 00:10:19.080
White's Evil Queen never actually says mirror mirror on the wall.

96
00:10:19.919 --> 00:10:24.200
In the original nineteen thirty seven Disney film, she addresses

97
00:10:24.279 --> 00:10:29.200
her magic mirror with the line magic mirror on the wall.

98
00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:34.360
Who is the fairest one of all? Somehow, the alliterative

99
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:40.600
mirror mirror version took hold in public memory, perhaps assisted

100
00:10:40.679 --> 00:10:45.960
by adaptations and parodies, and to this day people feel

101
00:10:46.000 --> 00:10:49.840
a jolt of disbelief when they learn the mirror was

102
00:10:50.440 --> 00:10:56.639
magic all along. These kinds of Mandela effect examples abound.

103
00:10:57.759 --> 00:11:02.519
Hellocharis was never ever spoken in the Silence of the Lambs.

104
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:08.039
Clarice's greeting is different, and the line if you build it,

105
00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:13.279
they will come from field of Dreams is actually he

106
00:11:13.799 --> 00:11:19.399
will come, referring to one character and not a crowd.

107
00:11:20.240 --> 00:11:24.240
In each case, the incorrect quote is remembered far more

108
00:11:24.320 --> 00:11:29.200
widely than the real one, a creepy reminder that even

109
00:11:29.320 --> 00:11:35.519
our most confident memories can be false. Those are just

110
00:11:35.600 --> 00:11:39.759
a few of the better known Mandela effects, but there

111
00:11:39.799 --> 00:11:46.919
are many many more. People have reported everything from geographic

112
00:11:47.039 --> 00:11:52.679
misplacements some swear New Zealand used to be north of Australia,

113
00:11:53.320 --> 00:11:59.000
not southeast, to altered names of products Jeff peanut butter

114
00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:04.320
being remembered as as Jiffy, which never existed as a brand,

115
00:12:04.720 --> 00:12:10.720
two entire historical details that don't match the records. What's

116
00:12:10.879 --> 00:12:15.360
consistent is that these memories tend to be shared by

117
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:20.679
a large number of unrelated people. It's one thing for

118
00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:26.120
you to misremember something, but when thousands of others confidently

119
00:12:26.200 --> 00:12:31.799
remember it the same wrong way, it feels like reality

120
00:12:31.840 --> 00:12:37.440
itself might be bending. Before we get carried away with

121
00:12:37.879 --> 00:12:43.799
paranormal explanations, let's dig into what science knows about memory

122
00:12:44.600 --> 00:12:49.440
and how so many people could misremember the same thing.

123
00:12:51.039 --> 00:12:56.960
From a cognitive psychology standpoint, there's nothing supernatural about the

124
00:12:57.000 --> 00:13:03.240
Mandela effect. Human memory is fallible and prone to quirks

125
00:13:03.320 --> 00:13:08.360
that can affect many people in the same way. Far

126
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:13.480
from a perfect recording device, our brains reconstruct memories out

127
00:13:13.519 --> 00:13:17.799
of bits and pieces, and in the process they can

128
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:24.840
and do make errors. In fact, each time you recall something,

129
00:13:25.200 --> 00:13:29.840
your brain may subtly alter it before storing it again.

130
00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:36.720
Over time, these alterations can accumulate so that your recollection

131
00:13:37.480 --> 00:13:45.200
drifts further from reality. Memory researchers have long documented phenomena

132
00:13:45.840 --> 00:13:52.440
like false memories and misinformation effects. The Mandela effect appears

133
00:13:52.519 --> 00:13:58.399
to be a spectacular instance of collective false memory, likely

134
00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:03.720
arising from nor normal brain tendencies that we all share.

135
00:14:05.399 --> 00:14:11.759
Psychologists highlight several key mechanisms that help explain these shared

136
00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:19.840
memory distortions. Schema and association. Our mind use schemas patterns

137
00:14:19.879 --> 00:14:24.759
of related knowledge to fill in gaps in memory. We

138
00:14:24.919 --> 00:14:28.159
tend to remember these the way we expect them to be.

139
00:14:29.120 --> 00:14:33.799
For example, people might assume the monopoly man wears a

140
00:14:33.879 --> 00:14:38.120
monocle because a monocle fits the image of a paush

141
00:14:38.639 --> 00:14:44.600
early twentieth century tycoon. In a twenty twenty two study

142
00:14:44.639 --> 00:14:50.360
on the visual Mandela effect, researchers indeed found that many

143
00:14:50.600 --> 00:14:56.240
visual misrememberings, like the monocle that never was, stem from

144
00:14:56.279 --> 00:15:02.840
our brain's schema driven expectations. In other words, we remember

145
00:15:02.879 --> 00:15:07.399
a detail that makes sense even if it wasn't truly

146
00:15:07.600 --> 00:15:13.759
there because it aligns with our mental image. This study,

147
00:15:13.960 --> 00:15:19.519
conducted at the University of Chicago, confirmed that consistent false

148
00:15:19.600 --> 00:15:29.000
memories of certain images are a real, measurable phenomenon across people. Interestingly,

149
00:15:29.399 --> 00:15:34.679
the scholars concluded that no single explanation fits all cases.

150
00:15:35.759 --> 00:15:42.279
Some false memories arise from schema or expectations, others from

151
00:15:42.360 --> 00:15:48.080
one version of an image being more intrinsically memorable than another,

152
00:15:49.320 --> 00:15:56.200
meaning each Mandela effect may have its own mix of causes. Still,

153
00:15:56.840 --> 00:16:01.120
the take home message is that our memory tends to

154
00:16:01.399 --> 00:16:07.320
edit reality to fit our preconceived notions, and if many

155
00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:13.159
people share that same notion, they'll likely misremember in the

156
00:16:13.200 --> 00:16:19.440
same way. Confabulation is a technical term for the brain's

157
00:16:19.600 --> 00:16:25.200
habit of fabricating details in order to fill memory gaps

158
00:16:25.720 --> 00:16:34.080
without the person realizing it. Confabulation isn't lying. It happens subconsciously.

159
00:16:34.960 --> 00:16:39.799
Your brain wants memories to form a coherent story, so

160
00:16:40.240 --> 00:16:46.639
when bits are missing, it may unintentionally invent plausible details

161
00:16:47.120 --> 00:16:52.120
in order to plug the holes. Over time, these invented

162
00:16:52.240 --> 00:16:58.879
details feel just as real as the true information. For instance,

163
00:16:59.480 --> 00:17:05.160
someone recalling the Berenstain Bears might think it was spelled

164
00:17:05.319 --> 00:17:12.599
like Steen, wasn't it because many common surnames Einstein, Frankenstein,

165
00:17:13.359 --> 00:17:19.160
and in stei n and their brain plugs in that

166
00:17:19.960 --> 00:17:25.920
familiar pattern. If lots of people's brains do this, they

167
00:17:26.039 --> 00:17:42.559
all confidently misremember the spelling together. It's worth noting confabulation

168
00:17:42.960 --> 00:17:47.440
tends to increase with age, which might be why many

169
00:17:47.599 --> 00:17:55.279
Mandela affect examples involve childhood popular culture. People recalling things

170
00:17:55.359 --> 00:17:59.559
from decades ago might be more likely to have filled

171
00:17:59.559 --> 00:18:06.920
in gasps over time. Then there's the misinformation effect. Our

172
00:18:07.119 --> 00:18:13.759
memories are vulnerable to post event information. Simply hearing or

173
00:18:14.039 --> 00:18:18.880
reading a wrong detail can implant a false memory of it.

174
00:18:19.680 --> 00:18:25.599
Psychologists have shown that if someone subtly suggests an incorrect fact,

175
00:18:26.440 --> 00:18:30.440
even with a single word choice, it can alter how

176
00:18:30.519 --> 00:18:35.759
others recall that event. In the context of the Mandela effect,

177
00:18:36.319 --> 00:18:41.720
Once a false idea starts circulating, such as it was mirror,

178
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:46.039
mirror on the wall in snow white, it can spread

179
00:18:46.160 --> 00:18:52.680
like wildfire and contaminate many people's recollections. A person might

180
00:18:52.759 --> 00:18:56.960
not even remember where they heard the incorrect version first,

181
00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:03.680
they just internalize it as what they remember. I witness

182
00:19:03.880 --> 00:19:09.200
testimony studies demonstrate how easily memories can be swayed by

183
00:19:09.440 --> 00:19:16.000
external suggestions. In mass media and online discussions, a single

184
00:19:16.240 --> 00:19:22.839
confidently stated false memory can ripple out to affect thousands

185
00:19:22.920 --> 00:19:30.839
of other people's memories. Then there's priming and suggestion related

186
00:19:30.920 --> 00:19:35.400
to misinformation. Priming is when our brains are prepared to

187
00:19:35.519 --> 00:19:40.319
perceive or remember something in a certain way due to

188
00:19:40.680 --> 00:19:45.079
prior cues. If you ask one group of people did

189
00:19:45.160 --> 00:19:49.480
you see the black car speed past? And another group

190
00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:54.319
did you see the black car? The first phrasing suggests

191
00:19:54.400 --> 00:19:59.720
there definitely was a speeding black car, and those people

192
00:19:59.799 --> 00:20:04.160
may later insist they saw it even if it wasn't there.

193
00:20:05.480 --> 00:20:10.119
With the Mandela effect, collective memories can be shaped by

194
00:20:10.160 --> 00:20:16.720
how questions or ideas are posed. For example, a forum

195
00:20:16.839 --> 00:20:21.599
post that says who else remembers the Oscar Meyer Beloney logo?

196
00:20:21.799 --> 00:20:26.759
Having an E instead of an A in myer primes

197
00:20:26.880 --> 00:20:32.400
readers to search their memory for that spelling, and many

198
00:20:32.559 --> 00:20:40.119
then feel like they do indeed recall it, reinforcing the idea.

199
00:20:40.160 --> 00:20:46.720
Our brains are highly suggestible, especially when a question presupposes

200
00:20:47.279 --> 00:20:54.200
a detail. Then there are shared cultural influences. Many mandela

201
00:20:54.319 --> 00:20:59.119
affect false memories can be traced to common sources or

202
00:20:59.400 --> 00:21:04.440
influences that set us all on the same wrong track.

203
00:21:05.480 --> 00:21:10.440
A parody or reference in popular culture can override the

204
00:21:10.519 --> 00:21:16.759
original memory. For instance, Sally Field's Oscar acceptance speech is

205
00:21:16.839 --> 00:21:21.319
often misquoted as you like me, you really like me,

206
00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:28.000
even by those who never saw it live. Why likely

207
00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:34.240
because actor Jim Carrey parodied that incorrect line in the Mask,

208
00:21:35.160 --> 00:21:41.079
and his version stuck in people's heads. Likewise, the line

209
00:21:41.559 --> 00:21:45.079
mirror mirror on the Wall was the title of a

210
00:21:45.160 --> 00:21:50.440
popular Snow White adaptation and is just catchier to say,

211
00:21:51.559 --> 00:21:56.839
so that's what got absorbed into collective memory. These kinds

212
00:21:56.880 --> 00:22:01.680
of media echoes mean large numbers of people are exposed

213
00:22:01.720 --> 00:22:07.279
to the same misleading version of an event or quote,

214
00:22:07.359 --> 00:22:14.119
resulting in the same misremembering. Even logos and images can

215
00:22:14.200 --> 00:22:20.319
be culturally primed. We've all seen generic depictions of overflowing

216
00:22:20.400 --> 00:22:25.359
fruit baskets, hence the false memory of a cornicopia in

217
00:22:25.440 --> 00:22:30.599
the Fruit of the Loom's logo, or cartoon aristocrats with monocles,

218
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:34.720
leading us to add a monocle to mister monopoly. As

219
00:22:34.759 --> 00:22:39.880
we pointed out in essence, our brains are pattern seeking

220
00:22:40.000 --> 00:22:46.000
machines that often substitute logical guesses for missing facts, and

221
00:22:46.119 --> 00:22:51.519
our memories are socially influenced by what others say, so

222
00:22:51.839 --> 00:22:54.880
it's not a huge leap to realize that, if the

223
00:22:54.960 --> 00:22:59.839
conditions are right, lots of people will form the same

224
00:23:00.119 --> 00:23:06.240
false memory. As one research paper aptly noted, examples of

225
00:23:06.319 --> 00:23:11.640
Mandela effect are likely quote explained in terms of the

226
00:23:11.720 --> 00:23:19.559
fallibility of human memory, rather than alternate realities. One study

227
00:23:19.759 --> 00:23:24.680
even found that seventy six percent of people made some

228
00:23:24.839 --> 00:23:30.759
kind of mistake when asked to recall details. Memory errors

229
00:23:30.880 --> 00:23:36.960
are the rule, not the exception. Most of the time

230
00:23:37.119 --> 00:23:42.079
we don't notice these errors. The Mandela effect only comes

231
00:23:42.119 --> 00:23:46.160
to light when a critical mass of people compare notes

232
00:23:46.839 --> 00:23:53.279
and realize they all remember something else in unison. And

233
00:23:53.359 --> 00:23:57.960
in the age of the Internet, that's exactly what's happening.

234
00:23:59.000 --> 00:24:04.240
If faulty human memory is the tender, the Internet is

235
00:24:04.319 --> 00:24:08.839
the spark that has set the Mandela effect ablaze in

236
00:24:08.960 --> 00:24:14.880
modern culture. In earlier decades, you might have privately misremembered

237
00:24:14.920 --> 00:24:19.000
a detail or two. Perhaps you'd even joke with a

238
00:24:19.079 --> 00:24:22.839
friend about a line from a movie and discover one

239
00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:28.119
of you was wrong. But today we have instant, global

240
00:24:28.160 --> 00:24:33.480
connectivity to find countless others with the same memory quirks,

241
00:24:34.200 --> 00:24:42.519
and this connectivity greatly amplifies the Mandela effect. Online communities

242
00:24:42.559 --> 00:24:47.480
allow people to share their eerie memory discrepancies and validate

243
00:24:47.519 --> 00:24:51.079
each other. A false memory that might have died out

244
00:24:51.160 --> 00:24:58.079
as a personal quirk can gain immortality once posted on Reddit, YouTube,

245
00:24:58.319 --> 00:25:03.759
or a blog, where it then snowballs as each person

246
00:25:03.960 --> 00:25:09.200
chimes in, I remember that too. It reinforces the conviction

247
00:25:09.480 --> 00:25:16.000
that the memory must be true. Psychologists describe this as

248
00:25:16.119 --> 00:25:21.839
an information cascade. Once an idea catches on, especially a

249
00:25:21.880 --> 00:25:33.880
surprising or mysterious one, it can spread exponentially through social networks.

250
00:25:35.279 --> 00:25:40.000
A large analysis of over one hundred thousand news stories

251
00:25:40.119 --> 00:25:46.039
on Twitter found that hoaxes and rumors spread significantly faster

252
00:25:46.759 --> 00:25:51.680
and more widely than truthful news by about seventy percent,

253
00:25:52.599 --> 00:25:58.519
driven by real users, not bots, sharing the information. In

254
00:25:58.640 --> 00:26:05.000
the Mandela effect case, the hoax isn't an intentional fake story,

255
00:26:05.640 --> 00:26:12.440
but a collective misconception. Still, the principle holds false ideas

256
00:26:12.640 --> 00:26:19.480
often outpaced the truth in our information ecosystem. The Simbad's

257
00:26:19.599 --> 00:26:23.640
Shazam episode is a perfect example of the Internet's role.

258
00:26:24.359 --> 00:26:28.799
By most accounts That false memory began as a discussion

259
00:26:28.880 --> 00:26:35.279
online where one person casually mentioned the sinbad Genie movie

260
00:26:35.720 --> 00:26:40.319
that they recalled. Others reading it searched their own memories,

261
00:26:40.359 --> 00:26:45.519
and many said, yes, I remember that too. In trying

262
00:26:45.559 --> 00:26:49.680
to resolve the discrepancy, seeing as no record of the

263
00:26:49.680 --> 00:26:55.279
film exists, yet so many insist on it, people collaborated,

264
00:26:55.720 --> 00:27:01.640
each adding imagined details a remembered scene here, a fragment

265
00:27:01.720 --> 00:27:07.680
of a poster there, inadvertently crafting a richer false narrative.

266
00:27:08.799 --> 00:27:15.359
This accumulated detail made the collective memory feel even more convincing.

267
00:27:16.720 --> 00:27:21.279
A few coincidental real events, like Simbad once hosting a

268
00:27:21.400 --> 00:27:26.839
TV marathon in a Genie costume, or old VHS tapes

269
00:27:26.880 --> 00:27:32.559
of Kazam being conflated with Simbad's image gave just enough

270
00:27:32.720 --> 00:27:37.119
plausibility that the internet tale took on a life of

271
00:27:37.160 --> 00:27:42.759
its own. Before long, Shazam was a legend that tens

272
00:27:42.839 --> 00:27:49.039
of thousands of people remembered, thanks largely to message boards

273
00:27:49.119 --> 00:27:54.480
and later YouTube videos discussing it. What we see is

274
00:27:54.519 --> 00:27:59.359
that the repetition is power. Studies show that the more

275
00:27:59.480 --> 00:28:05.240
times you recall or recount a memory, even incorrectly, the

276
00:28:05.279 --> 00:28:10.960
more confident you become in it, while actual accuracy often

277
00:28:11.119 --> 00:28:17.640
drops Online, these false memories get repeated and shared ad infinitum,

278
00:28:18.519 --> 00:28:24.759
which for many converts a flimsy recollection into an unshakable certainty.

279
00:28:26.640 --> 00:28:31.799
Beyond spreading specific instances, the Internet has made the Mandela

280
00:28:31.920 --> 00:28:36.240
effect a cultural phenomenon in its own right. There are

281
00:28:36.400 --> 00:28:41.319
thriving forums like the r slash Mendela affect subreddit and

282
00:28:41.440 --> 00:28:46.359
social media trends where people actively hunt for new Mandela

283
00:28:46.440 --> 00:28:53.079
effects in everyday life. It's become a kind of crowdsourced

284
00:28:53.200 --> 00:28:58.119
detective game. Spot something that doesn't match your memory and

285
00:28:58.240 --> 00:29:04.119
post about it. Everything from corporate logos to famous paintings

286
00:29:04.279 --> 00:29:11.039
has been scrutinized by online communities looking for evidence that

287
00:29:11.119 --> 00:29:16.519
reality isn't what it used to be. It's no coincidence

288
00:29:16.599 --> 00:29:21.440
that this phenomenon has grown in the digital age. The

289
00:29:21.480 --> 00:29:26.039
Internet era is a perfect breeding ground with its rapid

290
00:29:26.519 --> 00:29:33.880
mass sharing of both information as well as misinformation. The

291
00:29:33.960 --> 00:29:39.960
cultural impact goes further. The Mandela effect concept has penetrated

292
00:29:40.039 --> 00:29:47.200
mainstream awareness. News outlets including CNN and Psychology Today have

293
00:29:47.319 --> 00:29:52.279
run pieces about it, and it often sparks trending conversations

294
00:29:52.319 --> 00:29:58.079
Whenever a new striking example hits TikTok or Twitter. In

295
00:29:58.119 --> 00:30:03.200
a way, its modern folklore, a collection of strange tales

296
00:30:03.279 --> 00:30:08.279
we collectively tell about how our world isn't quite what

297
00:30:08.319 --> 00:30:14.720
we thought. There's even an International Mandela Affect Conference or IMEC,

298
00:30:15.640 --> 00:30:21.119
that held events in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty, bringing

299
00:30:21.200 --> 00:30:27.359
together enthusiasts and researchers intrigued by these collective memory glitches.

300
00:30:28.240 --> 00:30:34.079
Attendees swap stories of their strongest Mandela effects and debate

301
00:30:34.279 --> 00:30:38.920
what's behind them. The fact that a relatively recent Internet

302
00:30:39.000 --> 00:30:44.440
meme has formal conferences and scholarly interest shows how much

303
00:30:44.519 --> 00:30:48.559
it has truly struck a chord. It speaks to a

304
00:30:48.599 --> 00:30:54.599
deep curiosity and perhaps unease about the reliability of our

305
00:30:54.799 --> 00:30:59.880
shared knowledge. After all, if we can misremember something as

306
00:31:00.200 --> 00:31:03.920
basic as the name of a childhood book series or

307
00:31:03.960 --> 00:31:08.119
a line from a famous movie, what else might we

308
00:31:08.640 --> 00:31:14.200
collectively be mistaken about. The Mandela effect has thus become

309
00:31:14.720 --> 00:31:23.160
a cultural touchstone, inviting everyone, skeptics, scientists, and supernatural believers

310
00:31:23.200 --> 00:31:28.480
alike to question the fidelity of memory and the nature

311
00:31:28.960 --> 00:31:35.359
of reality. Not everyone is satisfied with false memories as

312
00:31:35.519 --> 00:31:41.400
the only explanation The Mandela effects. Eerie nature has led

313
00:31:41.480 --> 00:31:47.640
to a range of speculative theories, some fun, some far fetched,

314
00:31:48.119 --> 00:31:54.039
proposing that something bigger is going on than just human error.

315
00:31:55.279 --> 00:32:00.960
These ideas venture into the realm of quantum physics, science fiction,

316
00:32:01.319 --> 00:32:08.079
and conspiracy, and while not supported by scientific evidence, they

317
00:32:08.200 --> 00:32:14.559
add to the mystique of the Mandela effect. One speculative

318
00:32:14.680 --> 00:32:20.799
explanation is that we're experiencing bleed throughs from parallel universes.

319
00:32:21.720 --> 00:32:28.880
In a hypothetical multiverse, countless alternate realities exist side by side,

320
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:36.319
some almost identical to ours, but with minor differences. Could

321
00:32:36.440 --> 00:32:42.640
Mandela affect memories be leftovers from realities where things have

322
00:32:42.759 --> 00:32:49.440
happened differently. The notion is as unfalsifiable as it is intriguing.

323
00:32:56.680 --> 00:33:01.960
The most popular fringe theory positive its alternate realities or

324
00:33:02.160 --> 00:33:07.119
parallel universes. In this view, the Mandela fact might be

325
00:33:07.359 --> 00:33:14.319
evidence that multiple timelines or dimensions have somehow converged or shifted.

326
00:33:15.039 --> 00:33:21.720
People speculate that perhaps we or our consciousness occasionally slip

327
00:33:21.799 --> 00:33:26.759
into a closely neighboring universe with a slightly different history,

328
00:33:27.640 --> 00:33:31.920
or that two timelines merge and left some of us

329
00:33:31.960 --> 00:33:37.279
with memories from timeline A, while we now live in

330
00:33:37.440 --> 00:33:43.599
timeline B. Those who feel certain that reality has changed

331
00:33:43.720 --> 00:33:48.839
love to point out this idea. After all, if infinite

332
00:33:48.920 --> 00:33:54.200
parallel worlds exist, a concept entertained in some interpretations of

333
00:33:54.519 --> 00:34:00.319
quantum physics, it's tempting to blame a collective memory discrepancy

334
00:34:00.480 --> 00:34:08.400
on timeline trouble rather than human fallibility. For example, they'd say,

335
00:34:08.519 --> 00:34:13.239
maybe in another universe, Nelson Mandela did in fact die

336
00:34:13.360 --> 00:34:17.360
in prison in the nineteen eighties, and some of us

337
00:34:17.480 --> 00:34:23.840
happened to experience or inherent memories from that world. Or

338
00:34:23.920 --> 00:34:28.039
there really was a sinbad Genie movie in a parallel

339
00:34:28.159 --> 00:34:33.960
timeline but not in this one. As wild as it sounds,

340
00:34:34.599 --> 00:34:40.360
this theory can't be definitively disproven by its nature. If

341
00:34:40.440 --> 00:34:45.119
alternate realities were bleeding into ours, we would only have

342
00:34:45.239 --> 00:34:51.559
the memories as clues. The unfalsifiability gives the idea a

343
00:34:51.599 --> 00:34:57.320
certain allure. You can't prove we haven't hopped between realities,

344
00:34:57.360 --> 00:35:02.639
so who's to say it's a possible? For many, it

345
00:35:02.719 --> 00:35:08.280
injects a dose of cosmic mystery into everyday life, turning

346
00:35:08.320 --> 00:35:11.679
a simple memory mix up into a hint that the

347
00:35:11.840 --> 00:35:18.079
universe is far stranger than we think. It's essentially a

348
00:35:18.440 --> 00:35:22.960
glitch in the matrix hypothesis, the feeling that a glitch

349
00:35:23.079 --> 00:35:28.559
in reality itself, not just in our minds, is responsible.

350
00:35:30.119 --> 00:35:34.920
Researchers and skeptics, of course, largely attribute the Mandela effect

351
00:35:35.480 --> 00:35:41.280
to memory errors, not literal universe jumping, but that hasn't

352
00:35:41.360 --> 00:35:48.679
stopped imaginative theories from flourishing online. Some conspiracy minded individuals

353
00:35:48.719 --> 00:35:52.400
have gone further to speculate about what might be causing

354
00:35:52.440 --> 00:35:58.400
these supposed reality shifts. One theory points a finger at

355
00:35:58.440 --> 00:36:03.280
the large Hadron Collia at CERN. The idea, born from

356
00:36:03.440 --> 00:36:08.639
internet forums and YouTube videos, is that high energy physics

357
00:36:08.719 --> 00:36:14.920
experiments messing with sub atomic particles could be inadvertently slicing

358
00:36:15.000 --> 00:36:21.599
open holes between universes or altering our own timeline. This

359
00:36:21.760 --> 00:36:27.320
theory gained so much traction that actual CERN scientists have

360
00:36:27.440 --> 00:36:33.159
felt compelled to address it. Doctor Clara Nellist, a physicist

361
00:36:33.239 --> 00:36:38.119
with the LHC, famously responded to TikTok users who blamed

362
00:36:38.199 --> 00:36:42.480
CERN for things like the spelling of double stuff oreos

363
00:36:43.519 --> 00:36:48.320
as one viral Mandela effect involves people thinking it was

364
00:36:48.360 --> 00:36:55.719
always double stuffed oreos. In a humorous rebuttal, she reassured

365
00:36:55.760 --> 00:37:00.400
the public that know their particle collider isn't changing brand

366
00:37:00.559 --> 00:37:04.800
names on a whim. The discrepancy is simply a product

367
00:37:04.920 --> 00:37:11.920
label quirk, not a quantum catastrophe. As one science journalist quipped,

368
00:37:12.400 --> 00:37:18.159
the Mandela effect is a quote highly interesting conspiracy theory,

369
00:37:18.880 --> 00:37:24.039
in part because it is verifiably real in terms of

370
00:37:24.079 --> 00:37:29.440
the false memories themselves. But it becomes a conspiracy theory

371
00:37:29.840 --> 00:37:34.960
when people suggest things like cern creating quote portals to

372
00:37:35.119 --> 00:37:41.639
ultimate dimensions to explain it. Other speculative explanations people have

373
00:37:41.760 --> 00:37:46.679
floated include time travel e g. Perhaps someone went back

374
00:37:46.719 --> 00:37:51.639
in time and altered small things in history, causing retcond

375
00:37:51.719 --> 00:37:56.119
reality that only a few remember the old way, And

376
00:37:56.199 --> 00:38:00.360
of course, simulation theory, the idea that we live in

377
00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:05.400
a programmed reality akin to a computer simulation, and the

378
00:38:05.519 --> 00:38:12.119
Mandela effect represents small updates or glitches in the code.

379
00:38:12.320 --> 00:38:16.159
These notions are firmly in the realm of science fiction.

380
00:38:17.000 --> 00:38:20.960
There's no evidence for them, and they're not taken seriously

381
00:38:21.079 --> 00:38:26.400
by the scientific community, but they illustrate how profoundly the

382
00:38:26.440 --> 00:38:31.760
Mandela effect captures the imagination when confronted with a creepy

383
00:38:31.840 --> 00:38:37.360
collective misremembering it's almost human nature to wonder could there

384
00:38:37.440 --> 00:38:42.480
be a bizarre, unseen cause at play. It's important to

385
00:38:42.559 --> 00:38:48.719
label these ideas for what they are speculation and creative brainstorming,

386
00:38:49.639 --> 00:38:55.440
not scientific consensus. Ockham's razor would suggest that the simpler

387
00:38:55.480 --> 00:39:00.800
explanation that human memory simply isn't perfect is far more

388
00:39:01.000 --> 00:39:06.239
likely than believing entire universes are colliding to make us

389
00:39:06.320 --> 00:39:12.760
recall a fake movie. And indeed, memory researchers and cognitive

390
00:39:12.840 --> 00:39:19.360
scientists overwhelmingly explain the Mandela effect in terms of normal

391
00:39:19.679 --> 00:39:32.320
psychological processes. That being said, the Mandela effect occupies a

392
00:39:32.440 --> 00:39:38.880
unique spot between the mundane and the fantastical. On one hand,

393
00:39:38.960 --> 00:39:42.480
it's a testament to the quirks of memory and perception,

394
00:39:43.280 --> 00:39:47.639
a reminder that our brains can be confident and wrong

395
00:39:48.119 --> 00:39:52.719
at the same time, and that groupthink plus memory flaws

396
00:39:52.920 --> 00:39:59.760
can create compelling illusions. On the other hand, it carries

397
00:40:00.000 --> 00:40:05.199
almost spooky vibe that invites people to dream up what

398
00:40:05.400 --> 00:40:13.239
if scenarios about parallel worlds or simulated realities. Part of

399
00:40:13.320 --> 00:40:17.639
the enduring charm of the Mandela effect is that it

400
00:40:17.760 --> 00:40:24.440
lets ordinary folks play with big philosophical questions. It's like

401
00:40:24.559 --> 00:40:29.719
a mental x files we want to believe, even if

402
00:40:29.760 --> 00:40:35.199
it is just for fun. Ultimately, no matter how tempting

403
00:40:35.320 --> 00:40:40.119
the far out theories may be, the evidence strongly favors

404
00:40:40.239 --> 00:40:45.719
the explanation that the Mandela effect arises from a fallible

405
00:40:45.840 --> 00:40:52.280
human memory coupled with social and cognitive influences. We don't

406
00:40:52.320 --> 00:40:57.440
need parallel universes to have shared false memories. We just

407
00:40:57.559 --> 00:41:02.400
need lots of people with similar exposed to the same

408
00:41:02.559 --> 00:41:07.599
media and cultural references, all prone to the same types

409
00:41:07.679 --> 00:41:12.480
of memory errors. The real story is not any defect

410
00:41:12.800 --> 00:41:17.920
in reality, but the fascinating defects in our own mental

411
00:41:17.960 --> 00:41:23.199
record keeping. As one writer put it, quote, the Mandela

412
00:41:23.320 --> 00:41:26.519
effect is more likely a product of the holes in

413
00:41:26.559 --> 00:41:30.119
our memory than a rip in the fabric of space

414
00:41:30.239 --> 00:41:36.440
and time. Yet acknowledging the scientific explanation doesn't make the

415
00:41:36.559 --> 00:41:42.119
experience of the Mandela effect any less intriguing. There's something

416
00:41:42.320 --> 00:41:49.199
undeniably eerie about realizing your recollection and reality don't match,

417
00:41:50.039 --> 00:41:54.000
and even eerier when dozens of others insist on the

418
00:41:54.039 --> 00:42:02.039
same alternate memory. It teaches a humble lesson is malleable.

419
00:42:03.199 --> 00:42:06.760
We take for granted that what we remember is true,

420
00:42:07.480 --> 00:42:13.800
our personal truth, but the Mandela effect throws that into doubt.

421
00:42:14.760 --> 00:42:20.360
It encourages a healthy skepticism about our own certainty. If

422
00:42:20.440 --> 00:42:27.239
nothing else, it's a conversation starter that bridges science and mystery.

423
00:42:28.719 --> 00:42:32.800
In the end, the Mandela effect invites us to marvel

424
00:42:32.840 --> 00:42:37.440
at the quirks of collective memory. It's both an intellectual

425
00:42:37.519 --> 00:42:42.000
puzzle and a touch of modern folklore, reminding us that

426
00:42:42.079 --> 00:42:46.360
the line between reality and perception can blur in the

427
00:42:46.400 --> 00:42:53.039
most curious ways. The next time you distinctly recall something

428
00:42:53.079 --> 00:42:58.039
that history says never happened, you might feel a slight chill,

429
00:42:58.960 --> 00:43:04.559
but you'll also know you're not alone. Whether you lean

430
00:43:04.719 --> 00:43:11.079
towards psychological explanations or entertain the idea of parallel worlds,

431
00:43:11.679 --> 00:43:16.000
the Mandela effect is a fascinating mirror held up to

432
00:43:16.079 --> 00:43:23.000
our minds, reflecting how fallible, creative, and intriguing human memory

433
00:43:23.239 --> 00:43:28.880
can be. And for many, that little whisper of what

434
00:43:29.000 --> 00:43:33.039
if reality is not what it seems is what makes

435
00:43:33.079 --> 00:43:40.840
the Mandela effect so irresistibly spooky and satisfying. I myself,

436
00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:46.480
as a millennial, do recall the beren Steam Bears. Although

437
00:43:46.719 --> 00:43:51.199
that one didn't shock me so much. I vaguely recalled

438
00:43:51.840 --> 00:43:55.199
a cornucopia on the Fruit of the Loom logo. But

439
00:43:55.480 --> 00:44:01.239
again I never really paid attention. But it the one

440
00:44:01.280 --> 00:44:05.119
that still bothers me to this day that may bother

441
00:44:05.280 --> 00:44:10.119
you as well. Is I am certain, without a shadow

442
00:44:10.239 --> 00:44:14.960
of a doubt, that I saw commercials of Ed McMahon

443
00:44:15.519 --> 00:44:24.079
representing publisher's clearinghouse giving away money to contest winners, and

444
00:44:24.159 --> 00:44:28.280
I can't find a single shred of evidence that that

445
00:44:28.480 --> 00:44:34.800
ever occurred. Terrifying and True is narrated by Enrique Kuto.

446
00:44:35.119 --> 00:44:39.079
It's executive produced by Rob Fieldsman bobble Toopia dot com

447
00:44:39.119 --> 00:44:42.480
and produced by Dan Wilder, with original theme music by

448
00:44:42.559 --> 00:44:45.079
Ray Mattis. If you have a story you think we

449
00:44:45.159 --> 00:44:48.159
should cover on Terrifying and True, send us an email

450
00:44:48.199 --> 00:44:51.519
at Weekly Spooky at gmail dot com, and if you

451
00:44:51.559 --> 00:44:53.239
want to support us for as little as one dollar

452
00:44:53.280 --> 00:44:56.559
a month, go to Weeklyspooky dot com slash Join. Your

453
00:44:56.639 --> 00:44:58.920
support for as little as one dollar a month keeps

454
00:44:58.960 --> 00:45:01.320
the show going. Speaking of I want to say an

455
00:45:01.320 --> 00:45:04.760
extra special thank you to our Patreon podcast boosters, folks

456
00:45:04.760 --> 00:45:06.519
who pay a little bit more to hear their name

457
00:45:06.559 --> 00:45:09.119
at the end of the show, and they are Johnny Nix,

458
00:45:09.280 --> 00:45:14.239
Kate and Lulu, Jessica Fuller, Mike Escuey, Jenny Green, Amber Hansburg,

459
00:45:14.320 --> 00:45:17.320
Karen we Met, Jack Ker, and Craig Cohen. Thank you

460
00:45:17.400 --> 00:45:19.880
all so much, and thank you for listening. We'll see

461
00:45:19.920 --> 00:45:24.599
you all right here next time. On Terrifying and True